×
×
Skip to main content
(Sub)Culture

The 1984 NBA Draft, 30 Years Later: Time is a Flat Circle

(Sub)Culture

The 1984 NBA Draft, 30 Years Later: Time is a Flat Circle

Jordan, Olajuwon, Barkley, Stockton ... is the '84 draft still the greatest ever?

The NBA Draft is, in many ways, a microcosm of a larger problem: man cannot understand the construct of time.

The NBA Finals: Spurs Rout All That Was Not Life, Including Miami

As such, there’s a natural tendency to demarcate its torrential flow into points or moments of great import: birthdays, graduations, weddings, buzzer beaters, etc. In the NBA, the draft is one of these events. Several dozen players ranging in age and backstory are made to stand as a generation, their collective success or failure used as an arbiter on the state of basketball. They’re chosen together and then scatter into careers whose arcs stretch in every direction and duration.

It’s a devilishly hard impulse to resist, especially when considering a draft like 1984’s, when four Hall of Famers (Hakeem – then “Akeem” – Olajuwon, Michael Jordan, Charles Barkley and John Stockton) were selected and proceeded to dictate most of the league’s storylines for the next decade and – in Jordan’s case – well beyond. It is commonly referred to as “the Greatest Draft of All Time,” and rightfully so, though that label also comes with inadvertent consequences: the ’84 draft is the litmus test, the bar against which all others shall be measured.

So, while today marks the 30th anniversary of that esteemed draft, 2014 also marks the 20th anniversary of the 1994 draft and the 10th anniversary of the 2004 draft. And as such, we cannot help but compare them, either because of our desire to subdivide time, or our search for some larger meaning. Both appear to be relatively fruitless endeavors.

Why? Well, not to get all Rust Cohle on you, but time is a flat circle. The names (and number of buttons on the suitjackets) may change, but the “can’t miss prospects” and “project players” do not. Is there any more significance to the 10th or 20th anniversary of something than the 9th or 21st, or are they all arbitrary milemarkers, mere constructs of our mortal minds? Let’s take a look at the drafts that followed the epochal ’84 class to find out, and, since we can’t help ourselves, let’s peer ahead to the 2014 draft while we’re at it.

The 1994 NBA Draft

Ten years removed from the 1984 draft, the league had been thoroughly re-shaped by the players taken that year. Of course, not all of that was on them. Larry Bird, at the age of 38 – Tim Duncan’s age right now – had been retired for two years due to health problems and Magic Johnson, at the age of 35 – Kobe Bryant’s age – had been retired for three after announcing that he had tested positive for HIV. In fact, even Michael Jordan had retired, having won the third of his eventual six championships in 1993. Barkley was the MVP in ’94, and in Jordan’s absence, Olajuwon rose to prominence as the regular season MVP, the Defensive Player of the Year and Finals MVP as he led his Houston Rockets to the first of back-to-back championships.

In short, the members of the class of ’84 were still doing pretty well for themselves.

The class of ’94 would end up considerably more star-crossed. Before even setting foot on an NBA court, #1 overall pick Glenn Robinson made waves by reportedly holding out for a 13-year, $100 million contract from the team that selected him, the Milwaukee Bucks. Although he eventually signed a 10-year, $68 million contract, the controversy led to the institution of a rookie salary scale the next season, capping both the length and size of rookie contracts.

Second and third overall picks Jason Kidd and Grant Hill were the league’s first co-Rookie of the Year winners since Dave Cowens and Geoff Petrie in 1971. Given the lingering ankle problems that derailed Hill’s career in Orlando before he managed a resurgence as a defensive-minded veteran leader in Phoenix, it can be easy to forget just how good Hill looked in Detroit, but man he looked good (especially when accompanied by some of-the-era Pharcyde):

Although he proved to be more of a facilitator than a flashy scorer (he led the league in triple doubles in 1995-96 and 1996-97), Hill was the first player to encounter a rising tide of “Next Jordan” buzz in the NBA, though, in hindsight, with his even-handed blend of skills and his lack of alpha dog tendencies, he looks more than anything like the beta for LeBron James; call him LeBron version 0.8.

Kidd was no slouch when it came to all-around play, landing third on the all-time list for triple doubles in the regular season and tied for second in the playoffs. He also overcame early doubts about his shooting (he was nicknamed Ason Kidd – no “J”) to become a solid shooter, especially from 3-point range during his time in Dallas.

In the big picture, Kidd was probably the most impactful member of the ’94 class (though Juwan Howard hung around long enough to make himself part of the conversation): Was this draft better than ’84? No, but neither was the league.

The 2004 NBA Draft

Ten years later, the NBA was being defined by the by a clutch of players taken in years following ’94: Kevin Garnett in 1995, Allen Iverson, Kobe Bryant and Steve Nash in 1996 and Tim Duncan and Tracy McGrady in 1997. The class of ’04 also followed a year after what was likely the best draft class since ’84; LeBron James, Carmelo Anthony, Chris Bosh and Dwyane Wade were all drafted in 2003 (not to mention current NBA Finals difference-maker Boris Diaw and the newly minted record holder for most consecutive games with a 3-pointer, Kyle Korver.)

Dwight Howard went #1, becoming the third and final high schooler taken with the top pick, after Kwame Brown in 2001 and LeBron James in ’03. It’s safe to say his career so far is somewhere between those two rather extreme extremes. With Andrew Bynum’s career in limbo, Howard is also likely the last significant preps-to-pros pick, although an argument can be made for Al Jefferson. Maybe it’s because of his old school, back-to-the-basket game, but we don’t tend to lump Jefferson in with high schoolers who went pro like Garnett, James or Howard. But he was taken 15th in ’04, although it took him several years to blossom after struggling with injuries early in his career.

Second pick Emeka Okafor earned Rookie of the Year honors for the Charlotte Bobcats while 3rd pick Ben Gordon became the first – and so far only – rookie to win Sixth Man of the Year honors. But if the ’04 draft was short on era-defining players, it made up for it with a surprising amount of depth: Luol Deng, Andre Iguodala, Josh Smith and Tony Allen all had their names called.

But hey: Smith won the Slam Dunk Contest in 2005 and Andre Iguodala was violently and criminally robbed a year later in the competition. Tell me this isn’t one of the best dunks ever:

But best draft class ever? Not even close. Solid, but not spectacular. A transitory year.

The 2014 NBA Draft

So if the 1984 draft defined the ’80s and mid-to-early ’90s, the 1996 draft the late ’90s and early ’00s, and the 2003 draft the late ’00s through today, is the 2014 draft class the one that will come to define the next era of the NBA?

It’s entirely possible. This year’s draft has sparked some of the age-old questions about bigs versus wings, about potential versus immediate impact. While Andrew Wiggins was touted early on as a lock to go first for his rare blend of size (6’8″ with a 7’0″ wingspan) and athleticism (a non-official but still wildly impressive 44-inch vertical), he was less than overwhelming in his only season at Kansas, and there seems to some concern that he doesn’t have that “killer instinct,” whatever that means. As a result, Cameroonian 7-footer Joel Embiid has grown to become the consensus number one pick this year… at least until he injured his foot today. They’re the projects. Jabari Parker is the prospect, a polished, go-to wing scorer with defensive concerns, but likely able to produce on the offensive end immediately.

Beyond them, the prognostications only get murkier. The depth of this draft class means impact players could be found deep into the lottery. Any combination of Marcus Smart, Noah Vonleh, Nik Stauskas or Aaron Gordon could become this year’s Paul George or Stephen Curry – the guy who goes anywhere from 5th to 15th and ends up making a huge impact. And then there are athletic guys with upside like Zach LaVine (who can do this) and stretch fours like Adreian Payne (who can also win dunk contests). And then there’s Elfrid Payton’s outstanding hair.

Trending

So what does it all mean? Well, at the very minimum, these drafts reflect the ever-changing NBA. In the last 30 years, we’ve seen teams go from emphasizing building around big men – a major reason for 6’10” Hakeem Olajuwon going first to Houston even though they already had 7’4″ Ralph Sampson – to prioritizing high schoolers to reconsidering the impact of European players. And now, they’re finally inching toward a more thorough understanding of how to analyze young players.

But even with better tools and more video coverage than ever, we’re still far away from being able to fully understand or quantify potential, which is to say nothing of the effect that nurture can have on a player’s nature. What would Kawhi Leonard and Paul George look like if they switched places? What would Kevin Love have done with the Grizzlies, who drafted him before trading him to the Timberwolves for O.J. Mayo?

And since we cannot comprehend the infinite possibilities, we use the draft to organize a somewhat arbitrary collection of players into a generation, concentrating their meaning around a single point. The 2001 draft becomes the one where we realized high schoolers were a dicey proposition (Kwame Brown, Eddy Curry, DeSagana Diop and the late-blooming Tyson Chandler all went in the top ten). The 2007 draft becomes the one where Portland prioritized size over potential and ended up with Greg Oden instead of Kevin Durant. But this understanding – shorthand though it may be – only crystallizes years later, and often only after a decade.

And then we do it all over again. Time is a flat circle. Someone grab me a Lone Star.

The Latest

Go to PMC.com

You might also like

哆哆女性网够力解梦昵称网名大全低价建设网站营销策划推广网站网站正在重新规划建设中荣耀9a宋姓小女孩起名网站制作报价模板睢县王静洲属鼠起名字男宝宝2019属猪宝宝起名国外独立设计师网站重庆网站seo公司网站制作 预算seo吗南京科技公司起名河南商丘永城seo顾问服务伍首选金手指三沉默的羔羊电影高清免费观看神马网站seo排名带墨的网名女2字霸气在线seo课程郓城网站优化css设计网站朴实无华校园文周公解梦梦见房子漏雨昆明优化网站排名谁可以解梦419是什么意思网络语言周易名句 取名字淀粉肠小王子日销售额涨超10倍罗斯否认插足凯特王妃婚姻不负春光新的一天从800个哈欠开始有个姐真把千机伞做出来了国产伟哥去年销售近13亿充个话费竟沦为间接洗钱工具重庆警方辟谣“男子杀人焚尸”男子给前妻转账 现任妻子起诉要回春分繁花正当时呼北高速交通事故已致14人死亡杨洋拄拐现身医院月嫂回应掌掴婴儿是在赶虫子男孩疑遭霸凌 家长讨说法被踢出群因自嘲式简历走红的教授更新简介网友建议重庆地铁不准乘客携带菜筐清明节放假3天调休1天郑州一火锅店爆改成麻辣烫店19岁小伙救下5人后溺亡 多方发声两大学生合买彩票中奖一人不认账张家界的山上“长”满了韩国人?单亲妈妈陷入热恋 14岁儿子报警#春分立蛋大挑战#青海通报栏杆断裂小学生跌落住进ICU代拍被何赛飞拿着魔杖追着打315晚会后胖东来又人满为患了当地回应沈阳致3死车祸车主疑毒驾武汉大学樱花即将进入盛花期张立群任西安交通大学校长为江西彩礼“减负”的“试婚人”网友洛杉矶偶遇贾玲倪萍分享减重40斤方法男孩8年未见母亲被告知被遗忘小米汽车超级工厂正式揭幕周杰伦一审败诉网易特朗普谈“凯特王妃P图照”考生莫言也上北大硕士复试名单了妈妈回应孩子在校撞护栏坠楼恒大被罚41.75亿到底怎么缴男子持台球杆殴打2名女店员被抓校方回应护栏损坏小学生课间坠楼外国人感慨凌晨的中国很安全火箭最近9战8胜1负王树国3次鞠躬告别西交大师生房客欠租失踪 房东直发愁萧美琴窜访捷克 外交部回应山西省委原副书记商黎光被逮捕阿根廷将发行1万与2万面值的纸币英国王室又一合照被质疑P图男子被猫抓伤后确诊“猫抓病”

哆哆女性网 XML地图 TXT地图 虚拟主机 SEO 网站制作 网站优化