中国地震台网监测能力评估和台站检测能力评分(2008—2015年)

王亚文; 蒋长胜; 刘芳; 毕金孟

doi:10.6038/cjg20170722

中国地震台网监测能力评估和台站检测能力评分(2008—2015年)

王亚文^1,,
蒋长胜^{1, ,},
刘芳²,
毕金孟¹

- 1.
  中国地震局地球物理研究所, 北京 100081
- 2.
  内蒙古自治区地震局, 呼和浩特 010051
基金项目:
地震行业科研专项经费项目（201308011）

详细信息

作者简介:
王亚文, 女, 1992年生, 硕士研究生, 主要从事地震监测理论研究.E-mail: yawen_w@cea-igp.ac.cn

通讯作者: 蒋长胜, 男, 1979年生, 博士, 研究员, 主要从事地震监测技术和预测理论研究.E-mail: jiangcs@cea-igp.ac.cn

中图分类号: P315

收稿日期: 2016-05-06

修回日期: 2016-05-22

上线日期: 2017-07-05

Assessment of earthquake monitoring capability and score of seismic station detection capability in China Seismic Network (2008—2015)

WANG Ya-Wen^1,,
JIANG Chang-Sheng^{1, ,},
LIU Fang²,
BI Jin-Meng¹

- 1.
  Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China
- 2.
  Earthquake Administration of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Huhhot 010051, China

More Information

Corresponding author: JIANG Chang-Sheng, E-mail: jiangcs@cea-igp.ac.cn

Received Date: 06 May 2016

Revised Date: 22 May 2016

Available Online: 05 July 2017

摘要

摘要:
针对中国地震台网"十五"项目建成后的地震监测能力科学评估的需求，为进一步优化台网布局、提升边疆海域等重点地区监测能力，本研究利用"基于概率的完整性震级"（PMC）方法，对中国地震台网1001个台站以及2008-10-01-2015-09-17期间实际产出的地震观测资料进行了研究，分析了指定震级档下的检测概率P_E和最小完整性震级M_P的分布.除台网整体监测能力分布外，为直观地用单分值表述逐个台站的地震检测能力，本文发展了基于等振幅曲线的"地震检测能力评分表"，给出了国家台和区域台每个台站的地震检测能力评分统计特征和空间分布特征.此外，研究中还采用设定"最佳"地震监测能力目标函数的方式，模拟了通过改进观测条件可获得的地震台网监测能力提升的理论结果.研究结果表明，我国华北和东南沿海等东部地区地震监测能力较高，西部尤其是青藏高原南部地区M_p仅约为4.5，近海海域M_p仅约为3.5；从单个地震台站的运行效益角度，台网运行水平和地震观测资料的分析程度对台站的实际的地震检测能力影响显著，新疆等部分台站稀疏地区地震检测能力较高，而中等台站密度的贵州等部分区域相对较低；国家台的地震检测能力评分D_score系统优于区域台，新疆等西部边疆地区，以及福建等东南沿海地区的D_score明显高于台站密集的东部地区；模拟结果显示，在现有台站布局条件下，通过台站优化改造和提升运维管理水平，可显著提升对内蒙古西部、四川西部、甘肃-青海的北部交界地区、鄂尔多斯地块内部、贵州大部分地区，以及我国近海海域、朝鲜半岛北部和中南半岛北部地区的地震监测能力.
- 中国地震台网 /
- 最小完整性震级 /
- 地震检测能力 /
- PMC方法
Abstract:
To meet the demand of scientific assessment on earthquake monitoring capability of China Seismic Network (CSN) after the completion of the "Tenth Five-Year Plan" project and to further optimize the station-layout and improve the monitoring capability in the border and sea areas in China, this study investigated the seismic observation data of CSN with total 1001 stations during the period from 2008-10-01 to 2015-09-17. The distribution of seismic detection probability (P_E) and the minimum magnitude of completeness (M_P) were analyzed by using the method of "Probability-based magnitude of completeness" (PMC). In addition to mapping the seismic monitoring capability for entire CSN, we developed a new method named "seismic monitoring capability scale", and defined the seismic detection capability scale D_score to analyze the statistical characters and spatial distribution of the seismic detection capabilities for each national and regional stations, which was based on the amplitude contour curves. Additionally, the method of setting the "best objective function" of seismic detection capability was used to simulate the seismic monitoring capability improvement of CSN obtained by improving the conditions of observation. The result indicated that the seismic monitoring capability was significantly higher in the North China and southeast coastal areas of China. By contrast, the minimum magnitude completeness M_p in west China especially in the southern part of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is M_L4.5 and in offshore area is M_L3.5. Considering the operational efficiency in terms of single seismic station, the results also revealed that the operation level of seismic network and the extent of seismic data analysis can impact the actual seismic detection capability significantly. It also can be found that the seismic detection capability was higher in Xinjiang and other sparse station areas, whereas lower in Guizhou area with middle station density. The D_score scoring results of the national stations are higher than the regional station systematically. The D_score of western frontier regions and southeast offshore areas such as Xinjiang and Fujian are significantly higher than that of the eastern region with dense stations. The simulation results showed that, under the existing station layout condition, through optimizing and improving the observation quality of seismic station, enhancing the operation and maintenance level, the monitoring capability of network and the detection capability of single station could be significantly enhanced in regions such as the western Inner Mongolia, the western Sichuan, the northern border region of Gansu-Qinghai, the Ordos block, most areas of Guizhou, the offshore area of China, the northern Korean Peninsula and the northern Indochina Peninsula.
- China Seismic Network /
- Minimum magnitude of completeness /
- Seismic detection capability /
- Probability-based magnitude of completeness (PMC) method

HTML全文

图 1
PMC方法给出的深度10.0 km对应的中国地震台网检测概率P_E的空间分布

Figure 1.
Distribution of the detection probability P_E of China Seismic Network at a depth 10.0 km calculated by PMC method

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2
PMC方法给出的深度10.0 km对应的中国地震台网最小完整性震级M_p的空间分布

Figure 2.
Distribution of minimum magnitude of completeness M_p of China Seismic Network at a depth 10.0 km calculated by PMC method

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3
地震台站检测能力评分表(a)和评分统计结果(b)

Figure 3.
Seismic monitoring capability scale (a) and statistical result (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4
中国地震台网地震台站检测能力评分结果的空间分布

Figure 4.
Maps of China Seismic Network seismic monitoring capability result

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5
“设定目标”下的平均单台检测概率

Figure 5.
Average detection probability of the single station with "setting goals"

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6
中国地震台网“最佳检测能力”模拟结果

Figure 6.
The simulated results of China Seismic Network with "optimal monitoring capability"

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1
台站检测能力评分最高的10个国家台和10个区域台列表

Table 1.
List of the top 10 national stations and top 10 regional stations with higher detection probability score

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(37)

	Amorèse D. 2007. Applying a change-point detection method on frequency-magnitude distributions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(5):1742-1749, doi: 10.1785/0120060181.
	Cao A M, Gao S S. 2002. Temporal variation of seismic b-values beneath northeastern Japan island arc. Geophysical Research Letters, 29(9):48-1-48-3, doi: 10.1029/2001GL013775.
	Department of Monitoring and Prediction, China Earthquake Administration. 2003. Digital Seismic Observation Technique (in Chinese). Beijing:Seismological Press, 521-522.
	Enescu B, Ito K. 2002. Spatial analysis of the frequency-magnitude distribution and decay rate of aftershock activity of the 2000 Western Tottori earthquake. Earth, Planet and Space, 54(8):847-859. doi: 10.1186/BF03352077
	Gentili S, Sugan M, Peruzza L, et al. 2011. Probabilistic completeness assessment of the past 30 years of seismic monitoring in northeastern Italy. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 186(1-2):81-96. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2011.03.005
	Gomberg J. 1991. Seismicity and detection/location threshold in the southern great basin seismic network. J. Geophys. Res., 96:16401-16414. doi: 10.1029/91JB01593
	Gomberg J, Reasenberg P, Bodin P, et al. 2001. Earthquake triggering by seismic waves following the Landers and Hector Mine earthquakes. Nature, 411(6836):462-466. doi: 10.1038/35078053
	Huang Y L, Zhou S Y, Zhuang J C. 2016. Numerical tests on catalog-based methods to estimate magnitude of completeness. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 59(4):1350-1358, doi: 10.6038/cjg20160416.
	Jiang C S, Fang L H, Han L B, et al. 2015. Assessment of earthquake detection capability for the seismic array:A case study of the Xichang seismic array. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 58(3):832-843, doi: 10.6038/cjg20150313.
	Knopoff L. 2000. The magnitude distribution of declustered earthquakes in Southern California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(22):11880-11884. doi: 10.1073/pnas.190241297
	Kværna T, Ringdal F. 1999. Seismic threshold monitoring for continuous assessment of global detection capability. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 89(4):946-959. http://bssa.geoscienceworld.org/content/89/4/946
	Li Z C, Huang Q H. 2014. Assessment of detectability of the Capital-circle Seismic Network by using the probability-based magnitude of completeness (PMC) method. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 57(8):2584-2593, doi: 10.6038/cjg20140818.
	Liu F, Jiang C S, Zhang F, et al. 2014. A study on detection capability of the Inner Mongolia regional seismic network. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 36(5):919-929, 981, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2014.05.015.
	Liu R F, Chen X, Shen D K, et al. 2015. Broadband Seismogram Interpretation (in Chinese).Beijing:Seismological Press, 6-12.
	Main I. 2000. Apparent breaks in scaling in the earthquake cumulative frequency-magnitude distribution:Fact or artifact? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(1):86-97. doi: 10.1785/0119990086
	Mignan A, Jiang C, Zechar J D, et al. 2013. Completeness of the mainland China earthquake catalog and implications for the setup of the China earthquake forecast testing center. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103(2A):845-859. doi: 10.1785/0120120052
	Nanjo K Z, Ishibe T, Tsuruoka H, et al. 2010a. Analysis of the completeness magnitude and seismic network coverage of Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100(6):3261-3268. doi: 10.1785/0120100077
	Nanjo K Z, Schorlemmer D, Woessner J, et al. 2010b. Earthquake detection capability of the Swiss Seismic Network. Geophysical Journal International, 181(3):1713-1724. http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/content/181/3/1713.full.pdf
	Naoi M, Nakatani M, Horiuchi S, et al. 2014. Frequency-magnitude distribution of -3.7 ≤ M_w ≤ 1 mining-induced earthquakes around a mining front and b value invariance with post-blast time. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 171(10):2665-2684. doi: 10.1007/s00024-013-0721-7
	Plenkers K, Schorlemmer D, Kwiatek G. 2011. On the probability of detecting picoseismicity. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101(6):2579-2591. doi: 10.1785/0120110017
	Ringdal F. 1975. On the estimation of seismic detection thresholds. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 65(6):1631-1642. http://bssa.geoscienceworld.org/content/ssabull/65/6/1631.full.pdf
	Rydelek P A, Sacks I S. 1989. Testing the completeness of earthquake catalogues and the hypothesis of self-similarity. Nature, 337(6204):251-253. doi: 10.1038/337251a0
	Schorlemmer D, Woessner J. 2008. Probability of detecting an earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98(5):2103-2117. doi: 10.1785/0120070105
	Schorlemmer D, Mele F, Marzocchi W. 2010. A completeness analysis of the National Seismic Network of Italy. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115(B4):B04308. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234079606_A_completeness_analysis_of_the_National_Seismic_Network_of_Italy
	Sereno Jr T J, Bratt S R. 1989. Seismic detection capability at NORESS and implications for the detection threshold of a Hypothetical network in the Soviet Union. Journal of Geophysical Research, 94(B8):10397-10414. doi: 10.1029/JB094iB08p10397
	Stein R S. 1999. The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence. Nature, 402(6762):605-609. doi: 10.1038/45144
	Wang S Y, Yu Y X. 2009. Research on empirical relationship of earthquake magnitude scales and its influence on seismicity parameters. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention (in Chinese), 4(2):141-149. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-ZZFY200902004.htm
	Wiemer S, Wyss M. 2000. Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs:examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(4):859-869. doi: 10.1785/0119990114
	Woessner J, Hauksson E, Wiemer S, et al. 2004. The 1997 Kagoshima (Japan) earthquake doublet:A quantitative analysis of aftershock rate changes. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(3):L03605, doi: 10.1029/2003/GL018858.
	Woessner J, Wiemer S. 2005. Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues:estimating the magnitude of completeness and its uncertainty. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95(2):684-698. doi: 10.1785/0120040007
	黄亦磊, 周仕勇, 庄建仓. 2016.基于地震目录估计完备震级方法的数值实验.地球物理学报, 59(4):1350-1358, doi: 10.6038/cjg20160416. http://www.geophy.cn/CN/abstract/abstract12724.shtml
	蒋长胜, 房立华, 韩立波等. 2015.利用PMC方法评估地震台阵的地震检测能力——以西昌流动地震台阵为例.地球物理学报, 58(3):832-843, doi: 10.6038/cjg20150313. http://www.geophy.cn/CN/abstract/abstract11356.shtml
	李智超, 黄清华. 2014.基于概率完备震级评估首都圈地震台网检测能力.地球物理学报, 57(8):2584-2593, doi: 10.6038/cjg20140818. http://www.geophy.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10575.shtml
	刘芳, 蒋长胜, 张帆等. 2014.内蒙古区域地震台网监测能力研究.地震学报, 36(5):919-929, 981, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2014.05.015.
	刘瑞丰, 陈翔, 沈道康等. 2015.宽频带数字地震记录震相分析.北京:地震出版社, 6-12.
	汪素云, 俞言祥. 2009.震级转换关系及其对地震活动性参数的影响研究.震灾防御技术, 4(2):141-149. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZFY200902004.htm
	中国地震局监测预报司. 2003.数字地震观测技术.北京:地震出版社, 521-522.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计

点击查看大图

图(6)

表(1)

计量

文章访问数: 2164
PDF下载数: 1277
施引文献: 0

中国地震台网监测能力评估和台站检测能力评分(2008—2015年)

作者简介: 王亚文, 女, 1992年生, 硕士研究生, 主要从事地震监测理论研究.E-mail: yawen_w@cea-igp.ac.cn

通讯作者: 蒋长胜, 男, 1979年生, 博士, 研究员, 主要从事地震监测技术和预测理论研究.E-mail: jiangcs@cea-igp.ac.cn

Assessment of earthquake monitoring capability and score of seismic station detection capability in China Seismic Network (2008—2015)

Corresponding author: JIANG Chang-Sheng, E-mail: jiangcs@cea-igp.ac.cn

计量

出版历程

目录

作者简介:
王亚文, 女, 1992年生, 硕士研究生, 主要从事地震监测理论研究.E-mail: yawen_w@cea-igp.ac.cn